Editorials

WITHIN the last year or two, a question affecting in a degree the moral and physical welfare of every child of school going age in the United States has been receiving much attention in the press and from the platform, and for a time it seemed that the good sense and the sense of propriety of many communities had been or would be overridden by the persistence with which those who advocated the compulsory teaching of so-called sex hygiene in the public schools urged their views upon educators and school committees. Fortunately the current which for a time seemed to be setting so strongly in favor of this precocious and pernicious education as to threaten a tidal wave of wrecked ideals, has at length taken a turn, and in some communities, Chicago for instance, the determination to force this subject upon the attention of boys and girls of tender years has been abandoned because of the protests of parents who have revolted in amazement and disgust from the ruthless, needless wound and shock to the sensibilities of the children who have been subjected to lectures on this subject.

PREACHING before a famous association of scientists, a distinguished English prelate has recently remarked upon the stupidity of "the suggestion that there must be a barrier between knowledge and belief"! The exclamation is ours, and we use it because of the significant intimation, involved in the word "barrier," that while knowledge and belief may and should amicably dwell together, they pertain to two separate and distinct departments of thought. In view of the long-time war of words waged between them,this thought of possible fraternity between science and religion may be classed as "advanced.

AS the years go by, and the Bible is studied more and more by Christian Scientists, a desire comes at times to grasp more fully the meaning of the passages which seem to be obscure, the difficulty in many cases being due to their Oriental setting. All who are familiar with the literature of Christian Science are aware that Mrs.

IN reading the new volume, "The First Church of Christ, Scientist, and Miscellany," in which is garnered up for us the ripened wisdom of our revered Leader's lifelong endeavor for the uplift of humanity, one cannot fail to be impressed, among other helpful features, with the dignity and forcefulness of its Foreword. The largeness of vision, the keen foresight of threatening dangers, the tender admonition, the conservative summing-up of what had been accomplished in the establishment of the cause of Christian Science,—all these bring clearly before us the immensity of our obligation as followers of so devoted a Leader, when weighed in the balances of service to mankind.

IN crossing the bridge which connects the passing year with a new one, the more thoughtful are apt to look back, and then forward, and this always with the hope that the new year will bring better things than has the old. If it should fail to fulfil this expectation, it would only prove that the hope had not unfolded into faith and thus laid hold upon eternal reality.

THERE never was, never can be a more fatuous undertaking than that upon which men enter when they essay to fool themselves by trying, in some one thing, to evade the requirements of the simple, straightforward logic which they unhesitatingly recognize and act upon in other things. Upon inquiry respecting the matter, the average Christian believer will aver that God is the source of all real being, and that He is wholly good.

"A NEW year," Mrs. Eddy says in the opening sentence of the sermon written for the dedicatory service of The Mother Church edifice, Jan.

APART from the teachings of Christian Science, the relation supposed to exist between soul and body was at one time discussed with a good deal of freedom, when we consider the impossibility of reaching any definite conclusions on the subject by material means. The writer once heard two good deacons disputing warmly over the location of the soul, one insisting that it was in the brain, and the other being quite certain that it was in the heart, and each quoted Scripture in support of his argument.

Practitioners of Christian Science are ofttimes criticized for accepting fees for the treatment of the sick, on the basis that as the Master and his disciples healed the sick without money and without price, Christian Scientists, who profess to be his followers in word and in deed, should do likewise. In the early years of Christian Science Mrs.

Christian Scientists everywhere will welcome the announcement, from the publisher of Mrs. Eddy's books, in the Sentinel of Nov.