Editorials

" Integrity !" We linger on the word. We love it.

The commemorative rite which is recalled at our Communion season was manifestly instituted by Jesus out of consideration for man. Its gain is wholly for humanity and the true celebration must therefore be individual, subjective, spiritual.

We are glad of permission to publish the following letters received by our Leader, from Hon. Charles R.

The statement as it was given out by the Discoverer and Founder of Christian Science is sufficient to explain her position, and in connection with the article published in the Sentinel of June 13, to dispose of the statements to which she alludes; but it still remains a mystery why reputable magazines and newspapers open their columns to writers who, seemingly for the purpose of belittling Mrs. Eddy and her work, allege that this, that, or the other person was the Discoverer of Christian Science.

This clear and consistent statement of our Leader; appeared in The New York Sun of June 15, in the distorted form which we publish below. It will be seen that the word discover has been supplied for the word dissever, in the second line of the second paragraph, and that Mrs.

"My recent reply to the reprint of a scandal in the Literary Digest was not a question of 'Who shall be greatest?' but 'Who shall be just?' Who is or is not the founder of Christian Science was not the trend of thought, but to lift the curtain on wrong, on falsehood persistently misrepresenting my character, education, and authorship, and attempting to narrow my life into a conflict for fame. "Far be it from me to tread on the ashes of the dead, or to dissever any unity that may exist between Christian Science and the philosophy of a great and good man, for such was Ralph Waldo Emerson, and I deem it unwise to enter into a newspaper controversy over a question that is no longer a question.

The publication in The Literary Digest of May 30 of an article attributing the origin of Christian Science to Ralph Waldo Emerson, has led Mrs. Eddy to make the following statement, which appeared in The Boston Journal of June 8.

The paradox seems to have been a favorite form of expression with St. Paul, and nowhere does he use it more effectively than in his references to death.

The following paragraphs are taken from the newspaper reports of a most excellent sermon preached by Rev. Henry Van Dyke at the recent meeting of the Presbyterian General Assembly at Los Angeles:— "I want to speak to you to-day about the religion of Christ in its relation to happiness.

" The atheism of anxiety!" How a phrase like this fastens itself upon the memory, and despite all new and absorbing topics holds its own until we listen to its reiterant suggestion and accept its insistent message. We have always been aware, in some degree, of the tyranny of anxiety.